There was a time, not that long ago
actually that the word Wonga was nothing more than a slang word used to
describe money. It had no more meaning than words such as cash, reddies or
spodoolies (not sure if that is how it is spelt). But then a company who offered
payday loans was formed and they changed their name to wonga.com. This company
grew and quickly changed our perception of the word Wonga, probably forever.
The company managed to trademark the word
wonga.com so it is theirs forever. I guess they struggled to trademark Wonga
without the .com as that would be like trademarking the word coppers when
everyone knows it is a slang term for the police.
Many years ago in the 1980’s there was a
brand of slimming biscuits called Aides. This was at a time before any of us
had heard of HIV or anyone being HIV positive. The biscuit company disappeared
or at least dropped the name Aides as the word aides started to mean something
completely different. I think sometimes things can work the other way around as
it has with the word Wonga.
![]() |
Wonga |
It is clear that wonga.com is not the only
payday loans company out there, but they are pretty well the only one really
ever mentioned in the press. It is cleat that the press loves to hate Wonga and
I think they really do hate them. I see every day articles about how they
offered a loan to a child (of course they didn’t actually offer a loan to a
child, what I suspect happened was that somehow the child’s name was on a
marketing database and the child got sent a mailing or an sms). But the truth
is often irrelevant to the press, as they just want a story. A line I have
always enjoyed is “why let the trust get in the way of a good story” and that
is sometimes how it is the UK.
So Wonga are the route of all evil
according to many commentators. They charge outrageous rates of interest and
make load of money. Funny as I always thought that was what happened in a
capitalist society. The stockbrokers in the city, the banks, the oil companies,
the insurance companies all do the same. They charge a lot and make a lot.
I read that wonga.com is preying on poor
people and forcing them into debt. Now I have been out and about in London and
other cities and I don’t see too many people dressed up as puppets forcing
innocent people into side alleys to get them to sign a loan agreement. Maybe
when the press say that they are forcing people into debt, they mean that these
people say an advert, responded, lied about their finances, got the money and
couldn’t pay it back or refused to pay it back. So does that make Wonga bad? No
of course it doesn’t. They are just easy targets because they are hugely
successful.
What has always surprised me about Wonga is
how quickly they became market leaders. There were and are other companies who
have been around longer with massive financial backers and highly skilled
marketing teams who have nowhere near the profile of Wonga. Look at Payday UK
(Month End Money), they have been around for a lot longer and you rarely, if
ever hear them mentioned in the press. They are sizable organisations, turning
over hundreds of millions of pounds yet they keep their heads down and do not
draw attention to themselves.
So is it that Wonga actually deliberately
tries to attract the presses attention? It had been said many times that there
is no such thing as bad press and if this is true then the attention that
wonga.com gets must be worth millions of pounds of marketing budget. Maybe it
is as simple as that, they are generating the negative press attention deliberately
as it must make quite a lot of people thin to themselves maybe I should try
them?
But whatever the truth about the negative
press, there is no way to get away from the truth that they are incredibly
popular with their customer base and many people search for them on the
internet each day. It is a fact that more people search for the term Wonga than
they search for the term payday loan. That is an incredible position to be in.
It is the equivalent of more people searching for ant rather than insect. OK
not a very good example I agree, how about more people searching for “package
holiday, to Alcadia, staying on the ground floor of a 4 star hotel, with room
facing the sea and free evening drinks” than “holiday abroad”. The marketing of
Wonga has and is fantastic.
There maybe has never been a brand and or
company that is so hated by politicians, newspapers, charities, the church and
armchair experts yet loved so much by its actual customers. I am certain that
most, if not all, of the people who hate wonga.com with a passion have never
tried its service or needed money in a hurry. Whilst I appreciate that they
believe that they are protecting people who are in financial difficulty, the
trust is that none of them seem to know what it is like to be in need of money
and have nowhere to go because the banks won’t lend to you, the tax man has
taken all your money through VAT, fuel duty, PAYE and every other tax there is,
so you borrow from payday loans companies. One must remember that a lot of the
people who are looking to payday loan companies have very checkered credit
files. A number of them have taken loans and defaulted, or have CCJ’s for non-payment
of goods and so the payday loan companies are taking quite a risk in lending to
them.
However bad people believe that short-term
lenders are, they should remember that they don’t go around to peoples houses
and break their legs. The illegal lenders do.
About
the author:
Kieran
Moulden is the founder and Managing Director of True Blue Loans
(www.trueblueloans.co.uk), a company offering instalment loans over 3, 6 or 9
months, with fixed repayments and no fees, just daily interest. He is
passionate about ensure that consumers get a fair and honest deal when dealing
with short term consumer finance companies.
No comments:
Post a Comment